10 Controversial Magazine Covers That Had Tongues Wagging


The media has long been known for its ability to influence public perception and spark societal debate, often through bold and provocative imagery. Magazine covers, in particular, have served as powerful tools for capturing attention and conveying messages beyond the printed page. These covers often use shock value, controversial subjects, and striking visuals to evoke strong emotional reactions and drive conversations that range from highlighting societal taboos to exploiting current events and cultural phenomena. Below are ten controversial magazine covers that exemplify these ploys.

Times – O.J. Simpson’s Mugshot (June 1994)

Time Warner, Inc., American, founded 1990/https:/si.edu

Times magazine’s cover featuring O.J. Simpson’s mugshot fueled controversy due to the photo’s significant alteration. Photo edits darkened Simpson’s skin, creating an image that made him appear more sinister and menacing. This alteration, combined with the racially charged atmosphere surrounding Simpson’s trial for the alleged killing of his ex-wife and her friend, led to accusations of racism and sensationalism.

Rolling Stone – Boston Bomber (July 2013)

Rolling Stone/Facebook

A recurring modern argument in tragedies is the question of who should get the spotlight.   Rolling Stone’s decision to put Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving Boston Marathon bomber, on its cover was met with widespread outrage. The cover photo, which showed Tsarnaev looking like a rock star, had critics arguing that it was inappropriate to give such a high-profile platform to someone responsible for a tragic attack that killed three people and injured over 260 others. In contrast, others defended it as focusing on the problem, not the victims. 

Vanity Fair – Demi Moore (August 1991)

Vanity Fair/Facebook

Demi Moore’s cover for Vanity Fair, shot by famed photographer Annie Leibovitz, featured the actress nude and seven months pregnant. At the time, it was groundbreaking and controversial, challenging traditional norms about pregnancy and nudity in the media. The cover sparked debates about the portrayal of pregnant women, with some viewing it as empowering and others seeing it as inappropriate. Despite the controversy, it became an iconic image and set a precedent for future portrayals of pregnant celebrities.

Paper – Kim Kardashian’s “Break the Internet” (Winter 2014)

World Music Awards/Facebook

Critics argued that Kim Kardashian’s “Break the Internet” cover for Paper magazine, which featured her in a series of provocative poses, including one where she balanced a champagne glass on her bare buttocks, objectified Kardashian and perpetuated unrealistic beauty standards. However, supporters praised it for its boldness and highlighting Kardashian’s influence in contemporary pop culture. 

National Lampoon – “If You Don’t Buy This Magazine, We’ll Kill This Dog” (January 1973)

Edward Branley/Facebook

With a satirical move on aggressive marketing, National Lampoon’s cover featured a dog at gunpoint and the caption “If You Don’t Buy This Magazine, We’ll Kill This Dog.”  While intended as dark humor, it caused significant outrage, particularly among animal rights activists and readers who found the image disturbing and in poor taste. This cover is often cited as a classic example of National Lampoon’s edgy and provocative style, which pushed the boundaries of acceptable humor and satire in the media.

Life – War in Vietnam (1965)


Life magazine’s 1965 cover featuring the brutal realities of the Vietnam War was a significant turning point in American media. The cover showcased a stark image of a Viet Cong prisoner with his eyes and mouth taped, taken by photographer Paul Schutzer. This powerful image brought the harsh truths of the war into American homes, challenging the sanitized government reports and leading to a surge in anti-war sentiment, and was instrumental in shifting public opinion against the Vietnam War.

Time – Is God Dead? (April 1966)

Daniel Luchansky/Facebook

Remembered as one of the most controversial in Time’s history, it reflects the era’s shifting attitudes towards faith and spirituality. Time’s “Is God Dead?” cover, published in April 1966, featured bold, red text on a stark black background and sparked a national discourse about religion. The cover accompanied an article exploring the “death of God” theology, which argued that traditional religious beliefs were becoming obsolete in the modern world. This provocative question led to a record number of letters to the editor and widespread debate among religious leaders, scholars, and the public.

Golfweek – The Noose (January 2008)

Voice Within/Facebook

In response to controversial comments by golf anchor Kelly Tilghman, who suggested on air that young players should “lynch Tiger Woods in a back alley,” Golfweek’s January 2008 cover featured a noose. While intending to highlight the ensuing debate about race and racism in golf, the cover was widely condemned as insensitive and provocative. The imagery of the noose, a symbol of racial violence and lynching in America, was seen as highly inappropriate, leading to the dismissal of Golfweek’s editor.

The New Yorker – The Obama Couple Satire (July 21, 2008)

Curt Conrad/Facebook

With a cover that showed Barack dressed as a Muslim and Michelle as a militant, fist-bumping in the white house’s Oval Office with an American flag burning in the fireplace, the New Yorker’s exaggerated, stereotypical poses drew significant backlash during the 2008 presidential campaign. Intended as a satirical commentary on right-wing smears against the Obamas, it had critics from both political parties saying it was offensive and damaging, arguing that it could reinforce negative stereotypes rather than dispel them.

Esquire – “The Passion of Muhammad Ali” (April 1968)

Chamblin Bookmine/Facebook

The April 1968 cover of Esquire magazine, titled “The Passion of Muhammad Ali,” features an image of Muhammad Ali, the legendary boxer, posing as Saint Sebastian, a Christian martyr who was tied to a tree and shot with arrows. In this cover, Ali is depicted shirtless, with arrows piercing his body, bringing the image of martyrdom and suffering. At the time, Ali was facing severe backlash for his opposition to the Vietnam War and refusal to be drafted on religious and ethical grounds. His stance led to his conviction for draft evasion, rid him of his boxing title, and had him banned from the sport for four years.

Written by grayson